Argument Fact-Checker: Zingers, Jabs and Lies – Smoky Mountain News

10September 2020

SUBJECT: Welfare

Mast General Store

THE CLAIM: In the very first argument(at 1:17:08), Davis accused Cawthorn of desiring “to end well-being to balance the budget plan due to the fact that it encourages single ladies, particularly minority women to have more babies so they get bigger checks.”FACT-CHECK: We find this claim to be TRUE. At a May 21 conference at the Cherokee County

Republican politicianParty, Cawthorn said he had actually just recently spoken to Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., about”how important it is to wean the American individuals off of entitlements.””I do not believe it’s too far-fetched to begin just cutting 1 percent or perhaps 2 or

3 percent of privileges that we’re sending to individuals for thesewell-being mentions just down so we can gradually wean individuals off of privileges, “Cawthorn said. “That method, we can get our country closer to a well balanced budget plan to where we can begin running in the black. “And in a July 20 discussion with the conservative provocateur talk program host Charlie Kirk, Cawthorn said (at 44:40 )that”one of the best issues we have in our country is fatherless houses, particularly in minority communities.” “We subsidize fatherlessness because there are numerous monetary benefits to these girls to not

get married and have more kids since then they can get more aids for those kids,”Cawthorn informed Kirk.”You have a female who has seven kids from three different daddies, but none of those daddies are around.” PROSPECT RESPONSE:” Madison Cawthorn securely believes that the very best possible social program

is a task,”the campaign told AVL Watchdog. ********** SUBJECT: Green New Deal BACKGROUND: The Green New Offer is a congressional resolution that details a nationwide prepare for combating environment modification while likewise proposing dozens of programs to address economic inequality and promote social and racial justice. It requires the United States to wean itself from nonrenewable fuel sources and accomplish one hundred percent power from tidy, eco-friendly sources by 2030. The Green New Offer resolution is nonbinding, and nothing in it would

end up being law even if

Congress authorizes it. THE CLAIM: In the

second argument(at 49:30 ), Davis said:” My opponent keeps raising the Green New Deal and things that I have actually stated in settings. And I’ve said I do like the Green New Offer, but I’ve likewise refused to commit to back it, to supporting it … “Cawthorn then held up a piece of paper that, he stated, revealed Davis’s website on April 27, consisting of the statement,”That’s why I support the Green New Deal.”The declaration was later deleted from Davis’s website. CAWTHORN DAVIS DEBATE PHOTO FACT CHECK: We find Davis’sclaim that he has actually refused to support the Green New Offer to be INCORRECT. On his Moe Davis for Congress Facebook page, Davis wrote on Dec. 18, 2019:”It is our ethical responsibility to protect and secure our land, air and water for our children and future generations. Environment modification is real

and we can’t pay for to wait up until we reach a tipping point to act. We are currently lacking time. That’s why I support the Green New Offer. A focus on green energy and green technology will create jobs and secure our precious Western North Carolina

environment.”CANDIDATE REACTS

: “Yes, Col. Davis supports the Green New Deal. He has actually stated that consistently. However here’s the subtlety. There are something like 48 various parts to the Green New Offer. Col. Davis hasn’t accepted all 48,”the project stated in a declaration.” Yes, he broadly supports the objectives of the Green New Deal. However he’s not going to dedicate to approving legislation up until he sees the real bills. “When it comes to the deleted statement Cawthorn referenced, Davis’s campaign said, “[ We] were modifying our site just recently and placing new photos after Col. Davis shaved off his beard; we updated the

material to much better reflect his perspective. “********** TOPIC: Covid-19– Genuine or a Hoax? THE CLAIM: In the first argument(at 34:00 ), Cawthorn was asked if he took the public health hazard from the coronavirus pandemic seriously.”My fiancé works in health care,” he said. “I know from talking to her due to the fact that she’s actually been with the clients who are experiencing Covid-19 that it’s no hoax … I motivate each and every single among my fans and individuals in the country that if you need to wear a mask, if you are in that location of your life where you may have a pre-existing condition or you’re at an age where Covid-19 will greatly affect you, I encourage you, please practice social distancing, please use a mask and if I’m

around you,

I will use a mask myself.

“FACT CHECK: We discover this claim to be MISGUIDING. Cawthorn has appeared at numerous campaign occasions throughout the pandemic without a mask, typically with senior citizens in participation. In images, few, if any, of his fans are wearing masks, and Cawthorn is imagined shaking hands. The Centers for Disease Control and Avoidance recommends everybody use a mask in public and stay at least six feet away from others. Cawthorn’s statements explain he views using masks to be an individual choice, not a public policy problem, and recommends that social-distancing and mask-wearing precautions are mainly for the old and ill. CAWTHORN FOREST RALLY PHOTO At the May 21 st Cherokee Republican occasion (at 6:30), Cawthorn addressed

a question about absentee tallies and stated,”I do not really think that Covid-19 is that unsafe of an infection. “And in an interview airing on WKRK radio in Murphy, soon after North Carolina moved into Stage 2 of the resuming, Cawthorn expressed aggravation at the federal government’s speed. “It’s far past time that we

enable individuals to begin heading out and just enjoy our economy as a whole,”he said(at 14:40 ).” If we drop the government mandates, we could all return to living a roaring economy once again tomorrow.”Cawthorn continued( at 17:30 )that his buddies who owned organizations had no objection to closing when “they were estimating on the low end was that

2 million Americans were going to be

dead from this infection by this summer.”However when”an extremely, extremely few people actually understood&someone who had actually gotten a symptomatic variation of Covid-19, and none of us began seeing, you know, dead bodies lying in the streets, we said, ‘I think this was overblown.'”Cawthorn blamed”the mainstream media “for sensationalizing the infection”and because of that, we just

damaged our economy for no reason.”PROSPECT REACTION: A Cawthorn spokesperson said the prospect”believes that Covid-19 is no hoax and that all locals of NC-11 should take the precautions that they think are needed in order to stay healthy.”********** SUBJECT: Attack Defense

BACKGROUND: In 1994 Congress passed a 10-year Federal Attack Defense Restriction on the manufacture, transfer, or ownership of certain military-style civilian semiautomatic rifles and high-capacity ammo magazines. The restriction

ended Sept. 13, 2004. Routine efforts in Congress to restore the ban have been not successful. THE CLAIM: In the very first argument(at 44:30), Cawthorn stated:” My challenger at a fundraising event with his liberal good friends said that he wishes to ban all assault rifles, but he can’t really say that aloud due to the fact that then what would occur is the red voters would not elect him.” FACT-CHECK: Cawthorn’s statement is a distortion. We find the first part of Cawthorn’s allegation– that Davis wishes to ban all attack weapons– to be FALSE. As for Cawthorn’s assertion that Davis says things in personal that he won’t state in public, we discover that to be REAL, but

we also keep in mind that in our long experience most politicians do the very same. Davis, a gun-owner, states he supports “the Constitutional right to own handguns, rifles and shotguns, “but states he supports”more stringent requirements to purchase

military-style attack weapons,”including needing buyers to get an authorization, pay a fee, and go through a background investigation that consists of necessary psychological health records checks and reporting of any arrests including an act of violence. Applicants would likewise need to finish a full-day weapon safety course. Davis regularly argues for restrictions on sales of those weapons, which, he argues, is not the

same as supporting a ban. We discovered no record of Davis requiring a restriction on high-capacity semiautomatic rifles. Nevertheless, in The Smoky Mountain News, Davis was paraphrased saying in January that in a best world, just military personnel have attack weapons. And, according to a report in The Blue Banner, a student news publication at the University of North

Carolina-Asheville, Davis went to a little fundraising gathering in Asheville in February.”Davis stated he does not disagree with prohibiting attack rifles, however he does believe he would lose the election if he made that viewpoint public,” the press reporter wrote. The story estimated Davis as saying:”We simply can’t cram it down their throats or we’re not going to win.” In the very first argument, Davis said, “Look, I concur I wish to have no attack weapons on the street, however I put my policy out there and citizens can look at it, and if I do not keep my word, then fire me in 22 months.”PROSPECT RESPONDS: Cawthorn’s project said the allegation was supported by the combination of Davis’s statements, however it did not offer evidence that Davis has promoted banning high-capacity semiautomatic rifles. ********** TOPIC: Cawthorn’s Money THE CLAIM: In both disputes, Davis consistently called Cawthorn a multi-millionaire and on the 2nd nigh t(at 57:38 )questioned his credentials for Congress as”a 25-year-old with a $30 million settlement.”FACT-CHECK: Cawthorn is 25, however the statement about a$30 million settlement

is FALSE. Cawthorn submitted 3 lawsuits in Florida over his 2014 auto accident that left him partially paralyzed and in a wheelchair. Cawthorn was a guest in a SUV driven by his good friend, who dozed at the wheel, ran a highway and struck a concrete barrier wall. He informed Charlie Kirk they were tackling 70 miles per hour in a building zone. Cawthorn settled with an insurance companyfor $3 million and after thatsubmitted another $30 million suit versus the insurer, claiming it acted in bad faith. The court ruled in favor of the insurer. Cawthorn won a separate$3 million settlement versus the building business dealing with the highway, according to testament from his 2017 deposition. Cawthorn received a total of $6 million in settlements, he affirmed. One claim is still pending. He has stated he sustained about $3 million in medical financial obligation. CANDIDATE ACTION: A spokesperson for Davis acknowledged that the candidate erred in stating Cawthorn had actually gotten$30 million. AVL Watchdog is a not-for-profit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Sally

Kestin is a PulitzerPrize-winning investigative reporter. Peter H. Lewis is a former senior author and editor at The New york city Times. Contact us at This email address is being safeguarded from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to see

it. Source

: smokymountainnews.com

Our Score
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upgrade Your Listing

Add images, video, and more details to your listing! More information means more clicks. More clicks means more quotes!

Free listing includes: business name, address, phone, website, google map

Upgraded listing includes: business name, address, phone, website, EMAIL ADDRESS, COMPANY LOGO, VIDEO, IMAGE SLIDE SHOW, FEATURED LISTING PLACEMENT